Consciousness,
Freedom, and Evolution
The subject of
consciousness would overflow even a very large tome devoted to describing it.
The purpose of this post must be limited to demonstrating consciousness as the
exemplar of good in the universe. Part of the task consists of showing how
consciousness develops in evolving species like our own, and how freedom flows
from consciousness.
My reasoning about
consciousness in the context of these post on the “justification of the good”
rests on the assumption that the growth and development of consciousness stands
out as a commonly accepted instance of something which is good. Anyone reading
this paragraph will probably agree or they would not be reading this or
anything else. While it is true that a person suffering clinical depression
might prefer sleep to wakefulness, wish they had not been born, and become
suicidal, they and anyone who loves them would clearly see their state as a
tragic misfortune. Much of psychotherapy consists of enabling people to enjoy greater
consciousness. The same can be said of most medical care and of almost all
education.
Do we know what consciousness is?
A seemingly
insurmountable problem faces us at the beginning of any conversation about
consciousness, namely, trying to state clearly the very nature of
consciousness. For starters, it is indefinable. Consciousness stands alone as a
reality that does not belong to any genus and is not like anything else. But although
we cannot define consciousness, we can describe
it in the literal sense of the word “describe,” meaning that we can write
about it. We can also talk about it and certainly think about it. We come to
understand consciousness by contrast to unconsciousness as when we temporarily
lose consciousness because of an accident or anesthesia. Other contrasts
include sleeping and wakefulness, dreaming and awareness of our external
surrounding, and boredom compared to full interest.
Further, we can
look at conscious development both in the individual and in the species to show
how consciousness moves from mere sensation, to perception, judgment,
reasoning, and beyond. A problem presents itself in that all of these methods
assume that we already know what consciousness is. The good news is that in
fact we do know what consciousness is. Everyone who has ever thought of this
question already knows what consciousness is. So the only task of this work is
to articulate and interpret consciousness to show how it exemplifies the problem
of the good.
We can clarify our
understanding of consciousness by comparing the poles of a spectrum from
material to spiritual. If there is a totally non-consciousness being, what is
it like? Imagine a particle of matter as
conceived in traditional Newtonian science. It appears to be dead, inert, moved
and determined only by external forces, and impenetrable. By contrast, whether
or not we believe that any non-material being exists, we can think of a pure spirit, in contrast to
matter, as conscious, self-determined, and able to enter communion with other
spiritual beings. We humans are obviously not pure spirits and we have much of
Newtonian inertness about us. But if we have a degree of self-awareness,
self-determination, and openness to community, then we are to that extent
spiritual. An increase in spirituality as I use the term here, coincides with
an increase in consciousness.
When
we have moments of heightened awareness, we experience a more clear and intense
knowledge of our world, a greater sense of freedom, and a feeling of oneness
with people and perhaps things around us. Such heightened states may be
generated from a wide and diverse range of human activity as reported by those
who experience life-threatening emergencies, sports, music, contemplation of nature,
and traditional religious meditation. We
can imagine that consciousness, freedom, and communion extend to infinity as
all of our ordinary physical and psychological limitations lose their hold.
Every spiritual tradition claims saints and mystics who actually experience
unity with infinite being. More on the next post.
No comments:
Post a Comment